Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby Zamantha » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:17 am

Article on Mark Hewitt’s latest Book.

https://www.timesheraldonline.com/2018/ ... ssion=true
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If Zodiac ever joined a Z forum, I'm sure he would have been banned for not following forum rules. Zam's/Quote
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MODERATOR
User avatar
Zamantha
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:45 pm
Location: Cali

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby Jarlve » Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:43 am

Someone buy Ted this book. He should find it amusing.
User avatar
Jarlve
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby Richard Grinell » Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:13 am

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/dan-zupans ... ark-hewitt

Always interesting to hear other opinions, but unconvinced that Theodore Kaczynski was Zodiac.
Richard Grinell
 

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby Claypooles » Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:54 am

I'm still amazed that so many people seem to consider Kaczynski as not being a convincing suspect in the Zodiac case, while offering the goofiest names as the answer to who was the Z :roll:
Claypooles
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 4:32 am

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby morf13 » Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:43 am

Claypooles wrote:I'm still amazed that so many people seem to consider Kaczynski as not being a convincing suspect in the Zodiac case, while offering the goofiest names as the answer to who was the Z :roll:


He's completely the opposite kind of killer that Zodiac was. That's why Ted is dismissed so easily. Different signatures & MO's = different killers
User avatar
morf13
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6749
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:48 am
Location: NJ

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby Claypooles » Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:17 am

I guess people go the easy way, then. I don't see it like this at all, complete opposite actually! TK was angry at the world and more precisely at young people, because he wanted to be them but knew he was different, had always been treated as an outcast. At one point he made the extra step and started killing young people as a revenge, and then, once he had passed his "message" through newspapers and started to exist in the eyes of everyone, he went away from society (no more murders, just letters / starting living in a secluded cabin in the woods of Montana). But that desire of revenge through killing was still there, and he responded to it using his new hobbie, that is bombs. It's all there in the Zodiac letters!
And to me, killers can change their MO and signature. As I just said, Zodiac clearly turned to bombs after guns, and in between he had used a knike. Like he wrote himself: By gun, by fire, by rope, by knife. I am totally convinced that passing from Zodiac to Unabomber was a logical path. Both were unique killers, I don't think the common serial killer rules apply to Kazcynski.
Last edited by Claypooles on Fri Sep 28, 2018 2:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Claypooles
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 4:32 am

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby RTF » Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:32 am

Claypooles wrote:... I don't think the common serial killer rules apply to Kazcynski.

Yes, and same goes for Zodiac. His murders can be seen to merely serve a higher purpose - publicity/infamy/spreading fear in the community, via extortion of news coverage.

I'm not sold on TK, but am not dismissing him as a candidate.
RTF
 

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby Claypooles » Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:33 am

Exactly, just as TK's bombings supposedly served a higher (personal) cause than just killing people.
Claypooles
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 4:32 am

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby Jelberg » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:33 pm

morf13 wrote:Different signatures & MO's = different killers



Claypooles wrote:...killers can change their MO and signature....
....I don't think the common serial killer rules apply to Kazcynski....


As Claypooles mentioned, the death wheel hints at randomness. Ted would no doubt know that playing a "random" game, where he changed how he killed, would throw off attempts to identify him.
Zodiac even said himself that he was going to change the way he killed (to make it look like robberies, fake accidents, etc)
I guess if he changed his M.O. then Zodiac wasn't even Zodiac :roll:
Jelberg
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 9:04 pm

Re: Mark Hewitt’s 3rd Book

Postby margie » Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:26 pm

Claypooles wrote:I guess people go the easy way, then. I don't see it like this all, complete opposite actually! TK was angry at the world and more precisely at young people, because he wanted to be them but knew he was different, had always been treated as an outcast. At one point he made the extra step and started killing young people as a revenge, and then, once he had passed his "message" through newspapers and started to exist in the eyes of everyone, he went away from society (no more murders, just letters / starting living in a secluded cabin in the woods of Montana). But that desire of revenge through killing was still there, and he responded to it using his new hobbie, that is bombs. It's all there in the Zodiac letters!
And to me, killers can change their MO and signature. As I just said, Zodiac clearly turned to bombs after guns, and in between he had used a knike. Like he wrote himself: By gun, by fire, by rope, by knife. I am totally convinced that passing from Zodiac to Unabomber was a logical path. Both were unique killers, I don't think the common serial killer rules apply to Kazcynski.


Very well stated!!! My thoughts exactly!
margie
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:08 pm

Next

Return to Zodiac Books

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron